Senate Outside Spending vs Prediction Market Odds: Where Late Money Is Going

$742.4 million

in independent expenditures in Senate races reported to the FEC in 24- and 48-hour notices, for spending dated Oct. 1 to Oct. 23, 2026. 67% of it went to the 7 races where the market favorite is priced under 70%.

FEC filings and Kalshi/Polymarket market data, pulled Oct 23, 2026, 8:42 AM ET. Updated daily.

By Arthur Angelo, PredictionScout Research · Updated Oct 23, 2026, 8:42 AM ET

$742.4 millionlate outside spending
3,698FEC notices
67%in toss-up races
34states with spending

Key findings

  • 67% of late outside spending is in 7 races that Kalshi and Polymarket price as toss-ups (favorite under 70%, average of the two exchanges, snapshot of 2026-10-23). Ohio $176.6 million; Texas $148.0 million; Michigan $99.5 million lead all states.
  • Spending by tier: toss-up races $499.8 million across 7 states; leaning races $178.9 million across 5 states; not close races $63.6 million across 20 states; $34,750 in 2 states with no listed market.
  • Support vs oppose, as filed: 23% of the total was reported as supporting a candidate and 77% as opposing one, across 3,698 notices from 240 committees.
  • Largest spenders: Winsenate $110.1 million; Slf Pac $87.0 million; Texas Pac $49.6 million.
  • Largest single notice: $21.6 million by Texas Pac opposing James Talarico (D-TX), dated Oct. 20.
Late outside spending in Senate races, Oct. 1-Oct. 23, 2026Late outside spending in Senate races, Oct. 1-Oct. 23, 20260306090120150OH: 40.6TX: 20.2MI: 32.5IA: 18.3ME: 4.5AK: 8.7KS: 4.8NE: 6.6NH: 4.4SC: 5.1OH: 136TX: 128MI: 67.0IA: 55.8ME: 42.1AK: 29.3KS: 33.2NE: 27.1NH: 21.8SC: 11.4OHTXMIIAMEAKKSNENHSCSupporting a candidateOpposing a candidate$ millionsFEC 24/48-hour independent expenditure notices; PredictionScout
The 10 Senate races with the most outside spending in late independent-expenditure notices, split by what the filing committee reported.

Late outside spending by Senate race

Independent expenditures with dates from Oct. 1 to Oct. 23, from 24- and 48-hour notices filed with the Federal Election Commission. “For” and “against” follow the support/oppose box each committee checked. Market favorite and price: average of Kalshi and Polymarket in the 2026-10-23 snapshot.

RaceMarket favoriteOutside spendingTop candidates targeted
OhioSherrod Brown (D) 70%$176.6 millionJon Husted (R): for $28.7 million / against $62.5 million
Sherrod Brown (D): for $7.5 million / against $73.1 million
William Redpath (L): for $1.7 million
Gregory Lee Levy (I): for $1.3 million
TexasJames Talarico (D) 66%$148.0 millionJames Talarico (D): for $13.1 million / against $90.5 million
Kenneth Warren Paxton Jr. (R): against $20.9 million
Warren Kenneth Paxton Jr. (R): for $6.8 million / against $11.5 million
Warren Paxton Jr. (R): against $3.6 million
MichiganAbdul El-Sayed (D) 70%$99.5 millionAbdul El-Sayed (D): for $17.8 million / against $47.1 million
Michael J. Rogers (R): for $13.6 million / against $4.9 million
Michael Rogers (R): against $13.5 million
Abdul El-Sayed (?): for $856,908 / against $220,500
IowaAshley Hinson (R) 57%$74.0 millionAshley Hinson Arenholz (R): for $7.1 million / against $33.2 million
Joshua Turek (D): for $8.6 million / against $21.4 million
Josh Turek (D): for $2.3 million / against $915,419
Ashley Hinson (R): for $13,591 / against $174,954
MaineTroy Jackson (D) 66%$46.5 millionTroy Dale Jackson (D): for $1.4 million / against $23.2 million
Susan Collins (R): for $147,560 / against $15.9 million
Susan M. Collins (R): for $2.0 million / against $2.0 million
Troy Jackson (?): for $501,882 / against $946,500
AlaskaMary Peltola (D) 75%$38.0 millionDan Sullivan (R): for $4.3 million / against $17.4 million
Mary Peltola (D): for $3.1 million / against $11.8 million
Gerald L. (jerry) Heikes (R): for $1.4 million
Mary Mary Peltola (D): against $8,377
KansasRoger Marshall (R) 62%$38.0 millionAdam Hamilton (D): for $2.8 million / against $13.1 million
Roger W. Marshall (R): for $2.0 million / against $13.5 million
Roger Marshall (R): against $5.6 million
Adam Hamilton (?): against $1.0 million
NebraskaPete Ricketts (R) 74%$33.7 millionDan Osborn (I): for $6.1 million / against $14.7 million
Pete Ricketts (R): for $429,659 / against $12.3 million
Pete Ricketts (?): for $47,119
Dan Osborn (?): for $729
New HampshireChris Pappas (D) 90%$26.2 millionJohn E. Sununu (R): for $3.2 million / against $10.3 million
Chris Pappas (D): for $1.0 million / against $11.5 million
Edmond Laplante (RNC): for $105,736
John E. Sununu (?): for $57,441
South CarolinaDarline Graham Nordone (R) 41%$16.5 millionAnnie Andrews (D): for $1.7 million / against $7.0 million
Darline Graham (R): for $3.3 million / against $4.3 million
Annie Andrews (?): against $46,597
Darline Graham (?): for $46,597
GeorgiaJon Ossoff (D) 96%$11.9 millionT. Jonathan Ossoff (D): for $2.4 million / against $2.0 million
Michael A. Collins Jr. (R): for $133,212 / against $2.9 million
T. Jonathan Ossoff (?): for $1.9 million
Mike Collins (R): against $1.0 million
FloridaAshley Moody (R) 91%$11.8 millionAngela Nixon (D): for $3.3 million / against $3.0 million
Ashley Moody (R): for $1.7 million / against $3.4 million
Angie Nixon (?): for $365,776
Ashley Moody (?): against $73,221
MississippiCindy Hyde-Smith (R) 89%$4.9 millionScott Colom (D): for $2.6 million
Cindy Hyde-Smith (R): for $21,393 / against $2.3 million
North CarolinaRoy Cooper (D) 96%$4.0 millionRoy Cooper (D): for $2.1 million / against $1.4 million
Michael Whatley (R): for $123,075 / against $150,511
Roy Cooper (?): for $148,386
Roy Asberry Cooper III (D): for $15,192
MinnesotaPeggy Flanagan (D) 86%$2.8 millionMargaret Flanagan (DFL): for $1.5 million / against $1.2 million
Michele Tafoya (R): for $25,200 / against $71,000
Peggy Flanagan (DFL): for $16,165
Peter Allen Stauber (R): against $200
MontanaKurt Alme (R) 93%$2.5 millionSeth Bodnar (I): for $1.8 million
Kurt Alme (R): for $608,302 / against $12,376
Alani Ines Bankhead (D): against $113,687
South DakotaMike Rounds (R) 95%$2.0 millionMike Rounds (R): against $1.1 million
Brian Bengs (I): for $654,836 / against $225,475
LouisianaJulia Letlow (R) 93%$1.6 millionBlake Miguez (R): against $1.1 million
Julia Letlow (R): for $465,001
KentuckyAndy Barr (R) 97%$1.3 millionGarland Andy Barr (R): for $1.2 million
Andy Rep. Barr IV (?): for $22,314
Charles Booker (D): for $1,114
ArkansasTom Cotton (R) 95%$1.2 millionHallie Shoffner (D): against $1.2 million
AlabamaBarry Moore (R) 99%$286,582Felix Barry Moore (R): for $286,582
New MexicoBen Ray Luján (D) 96%$274,429Ben Ray Lujan (D): for $274,429
DelawareDemocrat 49%$231,764Christopher A. Coons (D): for $231,764
MassachusettsEd Markey (D) 98%$230,000John Deaton (R): for $230,000
OklahomaKevin Hern (R) 97%$186,556Kevin Hern (R): for $186,556
IdahoJim Risch (R) 96%$105,000Todd Baker Achilles (I): for $105,000
West VirginiaShelley Moore Capito (R) 98%$49,975Shelley Moore Capito (R): for $49,975
VirginiaMark Warner (D) 98%$33,089Mark Warner (D): for $31,518
Douglas Ollivant (R): for $1,571
NBno market$31,680Dan Osborn (I): for $31,680
WyomingHarriet Hageman (R) 99%$21,585Harriet Hageman (R): for $21,585
TennesseeBill Hagerty (R) 96%$21,224Bill Hagerty (R): for $21,224
Californiano market$3,070T. Jonathan Ossoff (?): for $3,070
New JerseyCory Booker (D) 97%$1,060Justin Michael Ll.m Murphy (R): for $1,060
ColoradoJohn Hickenlooper (D) 99%$670John W. Hickenlooper (D): for $670

Biggest spenders

CommitteeLate Senate spending
WINSENATE$110.1 million
SLF PAC$87.0 million
TEXAS PAC$49.6 million
DEFEND AMERICAN JOBS$42.2 million
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION$39.0 million
AMERICA PAC$37.4 million
LOWER COSTS NOW$34.0 million
NO GOING BACK PAC INC.$26.4 million
AB PAC$22.9 million
DUTY AND COUNTRY$15.7 million

Download the data

By race (CSV)By committee and candidate (CSV)

Totals by race, and by committee and candidate. Amounts are as reported to the FEC; no market price histories are included. Free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with a link back to this page.

Embed this chart

Methodology

  • Spending. Independent expenditures in 2026 Senate races from the FEC’s OpenFEC API (Schedule E), limited to 24- and 48-hour notices, the most recent version of each amended item, and expenditure dates from Oct. 1 to the update date (entries with impossible future dates are dropped). Memo subtotals are excluded, and an item re-filed in a second notice with the same transaction ID, amount and date is counted once. These notices are filed within a day or two, so they are the freshest view; the same spending later reappears in regular reports, which we do not add, to avoid double counting.
  • Support and oppose. Taken exactly as each committee reported it. Spending against one candidate is not reassigned to an opponent.
  • Markets. The favorite and its price come from Kalshi and Polymarket in our daily midterm snapshot (average of the two where both list the race). Tiers: under 70%, 70–89% and 90% or more.
  • Limits. Notices can be amended or corrected, and some committees file late; spending reported only in regular reports (for example, under the $10,000 48-hour threshold before the final 20 days) is missing; party coordinated spending and candidate spending are not independent expenditures and are excluded; a market price is a crowd estimate, not a forecast by PredictionScout. Nothing here is investment advice. Last run: Oct 23, 2026, 8:42 AM ET.

Cite this research

Suggested citation: PredictionScout. (2026, October 23). Senate Outside Spending vs Prediction Market Odds: Where Late Money Is Going. https://predictionscout.com/research/senate-outside-spending-vs-prediction-market-odds/

For a chart or news story: “Source: PredictionScout analysis of public exchange data (https://predictionscout.com/research/senate-outside-spending-vs-prediction-market-odds/)”

The data and charts on this page are free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 with a link back to this page. Spending: Federal Election Commission. Market data: Kalshi, Polymarket.

Data sources: prices and volumes come from the public APIs of Kalshi and Polymarket, with campaign finance data from the Federal Election Commission. All trademarks belong to their owners. PredictionScout is independent and not affiliated with any exchange. Nothing here is investment, betting, or legal advice.

Related: Senate fundraising vs markets · prediction market lobbying and funding · All research